I think that a lot of what I have read and watched makes complete sense and I agree with it. But I am still struggling to see the exact connection with how (maybe there isn't a difference, it's just in the way you teach it) comprehension and comprehension within Disciplinary Literacy are different.
I did have some aha's while reading Lee and Spratley's 20120 article The Challenges of Adolescent Literacy. I was amazed and excited to find out that they actually have an intervention to help in content areas. I think that they are correct in saying that high readers still need explicit instruction because they may be able to read higher leveled books but they do not possess the skills necessary.
For me the most obvious statement from Daniel Willingham's YouTube video was that "attempts to boost comprehension through reading strategies alone will fail." Well....OF COURSE THEY WILL. I know that I need to teach (yes-once again referring to my kindergartners) comprehension strategies to my kids who are ready for them. I have many children that can 'word call' read off the charts but can tell you absolutely nothing about what they read.
I loved and am going to incorporate the Chicago Reading Initiative's teaching strategies that Dr. Manderino put in his PowerPoint with my high readers who need major comprehension work. I love the layout, it's something I could easily have in my binder that I use during guided reading to help me remember what steps are involved.
I found an article that was interesting. interesting in the way that I do not know enough yet about Disciplinary Literacy to have a true opinion about it and that it sparked my curiosity about what someone who does know more might say to it. It's from Topics in Language Disorders: Building a House on Sand: Why Disciplinary Literacy Is Not Sufficient to Replace General Strategies for Adolescent Learners Who Struggle by: Faggella-Luby, Michael N.; Graner, Patricia Sampson; Deshler, Donald D.; Drew, Sally Valentino. They found that in the research done by (Taylor, Alber, & Walker, 2002) showed that only 1 in 5 groups showed that disciplinary literacy strategies outperformed control or typical strategies. It made me curious in the way of what is the best way, do we know enough about disciplinary literacy to make judgments without long-term studies, and what would someone from a disciplinary literacy background say?